Corrections & updates
Corrections & Updates Policy
Restaurant menus change, prices vary by location, and even careful research can become outdated. LatestMenus welcomes specific corrections and source suggestions that help make our guides clearer, more accurate and more useful.
What to report
Corrections are useful when they make a guide more accurate or more transparent
We prioritize reports that affect a reader's understanding or ordering decision. A correction request is strongest when it identifies the exact claim and includes current supporting evidence.
Price differences
A price appears outdated, lacks location context, or is presented too broadly for a location-specific figure.
Menu changes
An item was added, removed, renamed, resized or moved to a different menu category.
Nutrition or allergen details
A statement conflicts with current first-party nutrition, ingredient or allergen information.
Source quality
A stronger official source is available, or a source no longer supports the claim made in the guide.
Unclear wording
Language could cause readers to mistake an estimate, example or local price for a guaranteed nationwide figure.
Material omissions
An important limitation or ordering condition is missing and could materially change how a reader interprets the guide.
Review process
What happens after a correction is submitted
We do not automatically accept every submitted change. The goal is to review the evidence, understand location or timing differences, and make the wording match what can reasonably be supported.
Identify the claim
We locate the exact article, section, table row or statement being challenged.
Check the evidence
We compare the report with relevant first-party sources and useful location or ordering context.
Make the smallest accurate change
We correct, qualify, expand or remove the information based on what the evidence supports.
Update transparently
When the change is material, the article's updated date or correction context should reflect meaningful editorial work.
Types of changes
Not every edit means the same thing
An “updated” signal is most useful when it corresponds to real editorial review or a meaningful change. Cosmetic timestamp changes do not improve reader trust.
Editorial judgment
What we can and cannot promise
We aim to review credible reports and improve content when the available evidence supports a change. We cannot guarantee that every restaurant location will publish identical information or that every menu change will be visible to us immediately.
When reliable sources disagree, we may preserve the uncertainty in the article instead of forcing one version into a universal claim.
Report a correction or suggest a stronger source
Specific, evidence-based feedback is the fastest way to help us understand what should be reviewed.